A good compromise
Published: Sunday, Jan. 13, 2013, 8:53 p.m.
I thank the entire Pennsylvania congressional delegation – both Senate and House members – for supporting a compromise regarding the fiscal cliff that benefits our commonwealth's seniors.
The Pennsylvania Health Care Association and Center for Assisted Living Management is grateful that the compromise steered away from cuts to Medicare. I hope they remain pointed in that direction. Pennsylvania's skilled nursing centers stand at the brink of our own cliff. We're already reeling from severe Medicaid shortfalls and deep Medicare cuts over the past two years.
As Congress prepares for legislation to raise the debt ceiling, we stand ready to work with lawmakers to avoid further cuts to the long-term care profession. Our compass is set for 2013. We have rededicated ourselves individually, and as a profession, to enhancing the quality of care and improving the quality of life for all residents each and every day.”
Dr. Stuart Shapiro
The writer is CEO OF PHCA/CALM, a statewide advocacy organization comprised of more than 330 long-term care and senior service providers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Fuel tax increase
- Us & them
- Zubik is right
- Eagles’ plight
- Promotion questionable
- ‘Knockout’ evil
- Name game
- Delinquents often the working poor