Wind, environment win
Wind, environment win
Pennsylvania rang in the new year with a brighter future for wind power and clean air. President Obama and Congress began 2013 with a promise for cleaner air and water. They renewed critical tax credits for the growth of wind energy in Pennsylvania and across America as part of the package to avert the fiscal cliff.
Burning fossil fuels contributes to global warming, harms our health and pollutes our air and water. The renewal of the wind Production Tax Credit (PTC) and offshore-wind Investment Tax Credit (ITC) will mean more clean wind energy and jobs for Pennsylvania, without any pollution or global-warming emissions.
Wind power in Pennsylvania already prevents as much global-warming pollution as taking 218,000 cars off the road per year and could prevent as much as taking an additional 185,000 cars off the road in 2016 if wind growth continues at current rates.
We thank President Obama, U.S. Sen. Bob Casey, U.S. Sen. Pat Toomey and all Pennsylvania members of Congress who voted for this package for supporting wind power and a cleaner, healthier 2013.
Mary Kate Ranii
The writer is Western Pennsylvania field organizer for PennEnvironment (pennenvironment.org).
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- LCB: Asset to modernize
- Appalling advice
- Cops usually not problem
- ‘Affordable’? Not for him
- Protesters not law-abiding
- ATI’s broken promises
- Pass GMO label bill
- Report reactions III
- Working for him
- Arnold’s garbage