Share This Page

Gays right to marry

| Monday, Jan. 14, 2013, 9:09 p.m.

I am writing in response to the letter “Gay Marriage” (VND, Jan. 5). I think the writer is a little misguided about homosexuals and doesn't know some history.

There was a time when homosexuals were, indeed, arrested for their sexual orientation. In New York, police raiding gay bars seemed to be routine in the 1960s. Finally, gay residents and activists started protesting, and this started the Stonewall riots of New York in 1969 in Greenwich Village.

Homosexuality may be a sin against God in your eyes, but I can tell you that He made me this way. I come from a heterosexual family with two loving parents who taught me right from wrong and not to discriminate or judge a book by its cover. The Bible is how you interpret it. My God is a loving God and doesn't hate.

Why would I not have a right to marry if I want to? True, I cannot have children the traditional way that a man and woman do, but what about other couples who cannot have children and have to find other ways to procreate?

It is 2013. Americans have been through slavery and being discriminated against for the color of their skin. Americans have been through being looked at differently for marrying out of their race and having biracial children. Americans have been through being discriminated against for being homosexual. Americans will get through having gay marriage. We will one day have the same rights as everyone else — as we should. We are no different. We breathe and are human just like every other American.

Shannon Britton

New Kensington

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.