Gun battle brewing
A deadly ill wind of tyranny originating in Washington has potential to spread certain mayhem and death across our once great nation. Since the senseless slaying of 26 innocent victims in Connecticut by a mentally disturbed man, gun control has been at the forefront in every forum in America.
I have participated in and observed several polls concerning gun control, and if the polls are correct — and if President Obama's disciples try to have their way — there will be war!
So far the liberal politicians have given us every excuse except the plain truth, which is that they fear an armed citizenry. The citizens of this nation are mad, and why not? The nation is approaching $17 trillion in debt, with another $80 trillion in unfunded (stolen) liability for Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security.
I fear that Obama and his ilk do not realize that millions of people, just like me, have been simmering on the sidelines, patiently waiting for his term to expire in great hope that he does not touch what is both necessary and sacred to millions of us —the right to keep and bear arms. If the folks in D.C. think the Second Amendment is just about hunting, they are making a terrible mistake.
The Second Amendment is what separates the citizens, who are actually in charge, from the deadheaded politicians who serve us. The Constitution and Bill of Rights are perfectly clear; we do not see these sacred documents blurred as tyrannical politicians do.
I am just one of a sea of patriots who will exercise our Second Amendment rights against any tyrannical force that the Obama administration sets forth to disarm us. To do less would dishonor ourselves as well as our forefathers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Voting insanity
- Postal questions
- Bible under attack
- Family first
- Gruber, then & now III
- Gruber, then & now II
- Gruber, then & now I
- On right track
- Quarantine quandary
- Back to ‘Mad Men’?
- Enforce immigration laws