Gun-fee idea misfires I
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Friday, Jan. 18, 2013, 9:14 p.m.
The letter “Assess fee to own guns” (Jan. 11 and TribLIVE.com) by Jim Byrnes shows just what jerks we have in this country, as I see it. I believe that our Founders wanted all Americans to own guns to protect them from dictator types because that is exactly what most of those in politics are. They spout off that they want to be elected to serve the people, but they really want the power to serve themselves. By knowing that Americans have the ability to stop them, I believe that is reason enough alone to own all of the guns that one might want to.
I noticed recently that there were 115 people killed in Pakistan without using a gun. I also noticed that a woman tried to kill her ex by using a stun gun and dragging him with a car. Cars and bombs should be banned then, shouldn't they? I also read that a man wanted to build a bomb to blow up an iconic arch in New York City. I also heard that guns were used approximately 2.5 million times last year to protect and defend people. Why don't the media write about those happenings?
Like those who became dictators, only those who want to be dictators want to disarm the people.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Corbett’s choice
- Invest in pre-K
- ‘We the people’ are veterans
- Islam & women
- Drought answer?
- Proven success
- Medicaid’s future
- Slots & property taxes
- Prison plan & the public’s say
- Apollo-Ridge excellence
- Beneficial, irreplaceable