| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Per diems & Legislature's size

Daily Photo Galleries

Tuesday, Jan. 22, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

With his news story “Pennsylvania legislators ring up $3.9 million in per diems” (Jan. 14 and, Brad Bumsted has again opened our eyes to the question raised every year: Why do we need so many legislators in Pennsylvania?

It is pretty obvious from the lists of top 10 House and Senate per diem recipients that something is totally out of control. The lists do not even mention others who may be reaping similar per diem benefits, but nevertheless, the problem exists and changes need to be made.

It is time to reduce the number of legislators in Harrisburg. Doing more with less might be the logical answer, because they're going to put a slip in for their work anyway. How about a 12-month work schedule? How about a reduction in offices?

There are many financial problems in Pennsylvania, as in many other states. Why don't the voters, the taxpayers, resolve this problem on Election Day? Time to rethink our priorities and justify the need for the overabundance of these people.

Joe Poniewaz

Lincoln Place



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Stories

  1. Pirates notebook: Cole scratched from rehab start at Indianapolis
  2. Steelers’ Blake prefers secondary job
  3. Steelers notebook: Team extends Suisham’s contract through 2018
  4. City of Asylum app shines light on North Side
  5. Locke’s difficulties continue thanks to old friends
  6. Fired-up McNamara races to victory in Liberty Mile
  7. Police: Body found beneath Tarentum Bridge is jumper
  8. Pitt suspends cornerback Howard
  9. Churches putting faith in social media
  10. Driver describes fireworks-spooked horse that struck SUV near fairgrounds
  11. Police target 17 in Mon Valley drug investigation
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.