After the Republicans caved in on the fiscal cliff issue, I started looking for another political party. There aren't many choices.
I cannot vote Democrat. The Republicans are spineless and not much better. I won't vote for communism or socialism. The Libertarians are a possibility.
I wish the tea party would break from the Republicans and put up its own candidates. I would happily vote for the tea party.
Then I realized there remains a glimmer of hope — the debt ceiling battle looms. The war's not over; the Republicans have one last chance to stop Obama's spending spree.
But they're in a bad position. When Democrats talk about compromise, they mean the Republicans must cave in to their demands, which the Republicans do repeatedly.
That is the wrong strategy.
The Republicans' current approach eventually will kill the party. GOP voters have been very patient. The party doesn't put up many truly conservative candidates. Both Republicans and Democrats keep spending our money and regulating us to death.
I will watch the debt-ceiling battle closely. The GOP must make Obama cut programs — but not the military and senior-citizen benefits — and demand he make the first compromise.
The House and Senate Republicans need to explain that standing firm on the debt ceiling is necessary to control spending. They need to keep pointing out that Obama and the Democrats are the stumbling blocks.
Don't be afraid to shut down the government. And don't cave this time.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.