Gay is a choice
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Saturday, Jan. 26, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Gay is a choice
This is in response to the various responses to Rudy Gagliardi's Jan. 5 letter “Gay marriage.”
If homosexuality is caused by genetics, then upon which chromosome does this “gay gene” reside? There is absolutely no scientific or biological evidence that homosexuality is genetically inherited. Homosexuality is an acquired trait. It's not by nature, but by nurture.
If God made some individuals this way, then is pedophilia also a genetic inheritance? Using this “logic,” then Jerry Sandusky's behavior can be excused. Sandusky and his lawyers should have copped a plea of inherited genetic innocence. Had they tried that, they would have been laughed out of the courtroom.
If this is genetics and God made gays that way, then why is Homo sapiens the only species in the animal kingdom to exhibit this behavior? Animals innately know this behavior is perversion. The difference is that humans were given a cerebral cortex to choose — the key word is choose — between behaviors that are good and evil.
The claims that homosexuality is genetic or that God made gays is just liberals' way of avoiding individual responsibility for chosen behavior.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Corbett’s choice
- ‘We the people’ are veterans
- Invest in pre-K
- Islam & women
- Needs sign added
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Putin’s actions I
- Obstacles to hiring
- Slots & property taxes
- Conspicuous by absence
- Obama & Reaganomics I