In his column “Government regs that rule our lives” (Jan. 15 and TribLIVE.com), Ed Feulner confuses emergency contraception with medication abortion and uses this claim to disparage contraceptive coverage in health care reform.
Emergency contraception is exactly what it sounds like — contraception taken during an emergency. Once a pregnancy has occurred, emergency contraception does not work, and therefore, emergency contraception does not cause an abortion.
As an obstetrician/gynecologist, I recommend emergency contraception to many of my patients. Some experience birth control failure (condoms breaking) and emergency contraception prevents pregnancy before it occurs. I also provide women with emergency contraception after sexual assault.
In all of these patients, emergency contraception can help prevent a pregnancy from ever occurring. There are no circumstances in which emergency contraception causes an abortion.
Access to affordable contraception — including emergency contraception — is a crucial component to preventing unplanned pregnancies and will help improve health care for women. The contraceptive coverage mandate is a move in the right direction for women's health.
Rachel B. Rapkin
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- An Obama clone
- Better in long run
- White House not playing to win
- Farewell, my Springdale
- Hospital’s hero & more
- U.S. Steel worthy of grant
- Good ‘friends,’ good food
- Unworthy of high office
- Write-in alternative
- He’ll tax, we’ll pay
- Working hard in fast food