Share This Page

Duped vs. duping

| Saturday, Jan. 26, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

During the current pandemonium about Manti Te'o and his “virtual” girlfriend, let's cut him some slack. After all, our re-elected president, in his book “Dreams from My Father,” admitted that its references to his college girlfriend were not based on one girl, but portrayed a “composite” girlfriend. In the book's introduction, Obama said that “some of the characters that appear are composites of people I've known ... .”

Te'o was duped by someone on the Internet, whereas Obama did the duping of his readers by stealthily alerting them that some of the characters were composites — a euphemism for just making them up. I have more sympathy for a victim than I do for a conniver.

John Newell

McCandless

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.