TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Too soon for STEM

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

Letter to the Editor
Friday, Jan. 25, 2013, 9:08 p.m.
 

Too soon for STEM

We certainly need more qualified engineers than this country is producing, but I fear starting the Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) program in the fifth and sixth grades at Stewart Elementary is too early (“Burrell's STEM program not just about subjects,” Jan. 19). I very much doubt fifth- and sixth-graders have the tools to make problem-solving decisions.

As Burrell Superintendent Shannon Wagner said, some regional school districts have begun to stress STEM learning, but those programs are in their infancy and often are geared toward the secondary grades. The likelihood of success is far greater in the secondary grades and also if students who show an aptitude for engineering are chosen.

The bell curve predicts that only half of students are suitable for college — those who are above the norm. STEM learning will therefore be wasted on the other half, who likely will be confused.

Mike Mester

Lower Burrell

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. Living wage benefits society
  2. Gambling’s downside
  3. ‘Off-system’ bridges need feds’ help
  4. NK-A, Arnold have problems
  5. Obama & Hillary
  6. Stay away, Mr. Moreland
  7. Quit adding fluoride
  8. Bright lines: Climate calamitous
  9. Wanted: More choices