Don't tax rich
Don't tax rich
Higher taxes stifle initiative. I think we all would like to come up with an idea that would make us rich. But if the government would tax us at a very high rate, that may throw a wet blanket on our enthusiasm.
Allow me to make a hypothetical case: A prominent doctor believes he has a cure for cancer, but he would have to risk everything he owns to develop his idea. If the tax rate on what he would make would be too high, he might well say, “I can't take the risk.”
I'll take this a step further. Most people would say if he has a cure for cancer, that would be such a wonderful thing he shouldn't have to pay any taxes.
There are pros and cons to taxing the rich. There are more cons than many people realize.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Ambrosini’s logic lacking
- Better stores needed
- Treat UNC like PSU
- Superstition’s role
- Intelligent discussion overdue
- Corbett over Wolf II
- Inconsistent Wolf
- Corbett is the honest choice
- Corbett over Wolf I
- Gross in 45th
- Watson in 33rd