By The Tribune-Review
Published: Sunday, Jan. 27, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
I am pleased that President Obama committed in his inaugural address to do more to tackle global warming in his second term, building on the strong foundation his administration laid over the last four years.
From Hurricane Sandy, to raging forest fires, to the worst drought since the Dust Bowl, far too many Americans and the places we love have been devastated by recent extreme weather events fueled by global warming.
President Obama's second term offers a tremendous opportunity to turn the tide on this problem. Starting with rejecting the Keystone XL pipeline, the president must make fighting global warming a central priority.
Over the next four years, we are counting on President Obama to set tough limits on carbon pollution from power plants, to continue investing in the development of clean, renewable energy sources — including wind and solar power — and to implement dramatic energy efficiency improvements that will cut dangerous pollution and protect our environment and our families.
The president is poised to continue speaking out about the dangers of global warming. Even better, he is poised to act. I look forward to working with President Obama and his administration to do what it takes to tackle the challenges ahead.
Mary Kate Ranii,
The writer is the western Pennsylvania field associate for PennEnvironment.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Budget & business taxes
- Telling facts
- Strong enough
- Ukraine & history
- ‘We the people’ are veterans
- Medicaid’s future
- Corbett’s choice
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Invest in pre-K
- Islam & women