Perversion of democracy
Perversion of democracy
When Rob Gleason, chairman of the Republican Party of Pennsylvania, proclaims in his column “Pa. GOP is on the rise” (Jan. 18 and TribLIVE.com) that “the GOP is still by far the dominant party in statewide politics,” he may be right. But just in case he's not, Republicans have introduced House Bill 94, seeking to allocate most of Pennsylvania's presidential Electoral College representatives by congressional district, with two electoral votes going to the overall state winner.
Congratulations, Republicans! If you can't stop Democrats from voting, make sure their votes aren't worth anything!
One person voting Republican in a rural congressional district would be equal to thousands of Democrat votes in an Allegheny County congressional district. What a perversion of democracy!
Whatever happened to the democratic ideal of one man, one vote?
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.