TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Against fluoridation II

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

Friday, Jan. 25, 2013, 9:08 p.m.
 

In response to the news story “Westmoreland customers getting fluoride out of their water”: I agree with Charles Gallo, who's mentioned in the story as using a filter to remove fluoride from his tap water. There is a difference between calcium fluoride found in nature and man-made sodium fluoride, a byproduct of making aluminum.

Ingesting fluoride does have side effects. This was documented in the excellent book “Fluoride the Aging Factor.” Fluoride also makes people docile. The areas with the most fluoride are also the areas with the most dentists, so it doesn't work anyhow.

I guess when it comes to truth and money, money wins, and when it comes to health and money, money wins.

Sodium fluoride is a toxic chemical and it does not belong in the water supply or the human body. Sodium fluoride is a halogen, which means it competes with iodine absorption in the body.

No wonder more and more people are now having thyroid problems. The thyroid needs iodine, not fluoride. It's labeled in hardware stores with the skull and crossbones.

Eugene M. Goldberg

Hampton

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. McKeesport stands as a role model
  2. Real American exceptionalism II
  3. Stiffen gun penalties
  4. Council & UPMC workers
  5. Pension-letter ire II
  6. Real American exceptionalism I
  7. Misleading on Fawn police