Against fluoridation II
In response to the news story “Westmoreland customers getting fluoride out of their water”: I agree with Charles Gallo, who's mentioned in the story as using a filter to remove fluoride from his tap water. There is a difference between calcium fluoride found in nature and man-made sodium fluoride, a byproduct of making aluminum.
Ingesting fluoride does have side effects. This was documented in the excellent book “Fluoride the Aging Factor.” Fluoride also makes people docile. The areas with the most fluoride are also the areas with the most dentists, so it doesn't work anyhow.
I guess when it comes to truth and money, money wins, and when it comes to health and money, money wins.
Sodium fluoride is a toxic chemical and it does not belong in the water supply or the human body. Sodium fluoride is a halogen, which means it competes with iodine absorption in the body.
No wonder more and more people are now having thyroid problems. The thyroid needs iodine, not fluoride. It's labeled in hardware stores with the skull and crossbones.
Eugene M. Goldberg
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Biased? Guilty as charged
- ‘Food fight’ lamentable
- It’s not personal
- Getting bad advice
- Amendment levels playing field
- UAW won in Tennessee
- Out of ‘other people’s money’
- HUD & Larimer
- Low blow
- Diplomatic difference
- Seeking Christ in kids