Road-funding pitfalls II
Colin McNickle's column “‘Orwellian politspeak' on gas tax hike” was a good article, and I'd like to add something. For years, PennDOT has been stealing our gas-tax money to fund mass transit.
Article 8, Section 11 of the Pennsylvania Constitution specifically limits the use of liquid fuels taxes and motor license fund proceeds to construction and maintenance of roads and bridges. It further states that funds shall not be transferred or diverted for any other purpose (except short-term loans). This means mass transit is specifically excluded from receiving gas-tax funding.
Several years ago, under Gov. Rendell, I believe, mass transit was thrown into PennDOT, which I believe was a ploy to circumvent the state Constitution. This subject comes up every year when our mass-transit systems are back at the trough for money and raising the liquid fuels tax is proposed as the answer.
Our gas tax money is for roads and bridges, period!
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Foley & Obama II
- Foley & Obama I
- Bring back ‘eagle cam’
- Rushing to judge
- LED sign: Negative ad
- Self-serving & corrupt
- Missing WJAS
- Oberdorf firing incomprehensible
- Monopoly’s markup
- Life Care Center a jewel
- Better school security