TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review


Road-funding pitfalls I

About The Tribune-Review
The Tribune-Review can be reached via e-mail or at 412-321-6460.
Contact Us | Video | RSS | Mobile


By Tribune-Review

Published: Sunday, January 27, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Updated: Tuesday, February 19, 2013

I continue to read stories about the state's Oil Company Franchise Tax, including Colin McNickle's column “‘Orwellian politspeak' on gas tax hike” (Jan. 20 and TribLIVE.com). I was a Sunoco gasoline dealer for 15 years.

With each gasoline delivery, we received an invoice that had a breakdown of the total cost. This would include line items for the gasoline, federal taxes and state taxes including the Oil Company Franchise Tax. This cost has always been passed on directly to the consumer as a component of the total cost to dealers. I am certain this is true today, after talking to current dealers.

If wholesalers are passing it on now, why would they stop after the tax is increased? It is a tax. Regardless of who pays it directly to the state, it is being paid for by the consumer today as a part of the pump price. It will continue to be paid for by the consumer if the levy is increased.

It is easy for politicians of both parties to fool “low-information voters” on such matters because they think it is just one more thing they get for free from “Santa Claus government.”

Jim Bezeredi

Forest Hills

Most Popular Letters

  1. Enviro leftist tactics
  2. ‘Public Welfare’ misnomer
  3. Distorting or ill-informed
  4. Local zoning essential
  5. Malak thanks
  6. What am I paying for?
  7. BSA’s constitutional right
  8. Bell write-ins
  9. Rights: For people, not fetuses
  10. Sadly missed, fondly remembered
  11. Multiple Bibles: It’s OK
You must be signed in to add comments

To comment, click the Sign in or sign up at the very top of this page.

There are currently no comments for this story.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.