Legislators & guns
Legislators & guns
The argument on gun control can be summed up by one sentence in the news story “Gun owners rally on Capitol steps in Harrisburg” (Jan. 24 and TribLIVE.com), in which Mary Beth Hacke said her son was killed by “a criminal firing an illegal handgun.”
Her son's murder is tragic, but there is no amount of legislation that would have prevented the murderer from getting a gun. He'd already broken the law.
The only thing that additional restrictions on gun ownership will accomplish is making some people feel better that they're “doing something,” but such restrictions will actually do nothing.
Rather than respond emotionally to tragedies, legislators should calmly and rationally analyze the data to craft laws that will actually have a positive impact, whether focusing on guns, armed security in schools or the circumstances regarding the mentally ill.
I, for one, won't be holding my breath.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Give thanks for vets
- Postal questions
- Family first
- Bible under attack
- Gruber, then & now III
- Gruber, then & now II
- Enforce immigration laws
- Revisionism now
- For their own benefit