History & guns
History & guns
Our Founders knew that men left to their own devices can wreak havoc on one another, often under the guise of government policies. This is why our Founders provided the American people with the Second Amendment in order that we never become oppressed, enslaved or harmed by a tyrannical government.
Some Americans today seem to think that the Second Amendment is an outdated idea or concept. I beg these people to read a history book regarding Hitler's Nazi regime, Stalin's forced collectivization and Mao's “socialism.” May I remind you that untold millions of unarmed German, Soviet and Chinese citizens never got to learn from their mistakes because they were silenced for eternity, their silence deafening, their trust betrayed by men and governments that had such great “ideas” that they incorporated and instilled through government policies or “revolutions.”
Unfortunately, history teaches us that unarmed resistance to tyranny is futile, leading only to an early grave for those who oppose the injustices imposed on them.
The Second Amendment is what makes America different from these evil regimes. Its creation discourages and cautions our government against ever carrying out atrocities against its own citizenry.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Biased? Guilty as charged
- ‘Food fight’ lamentable
- It’s not personal
- Getting bad advice
- Amendment levels playing field
- UAW won in Tennessee
- Out of ‘other people’s money’
- HUD & Larimer
- Low blow
- Diplomatic difference