Contraception rejection II
Published: Thursday, January 31, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
Updated: Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Perhaps obstetrician/gynecologist Rachel B. Rapkin, writer of the letter “Contraception confusion,” is too young to remember that until 1965, the medical profession knew enough about biology that it defined conception as “the union of the sperm and ovum ... fertilization,” and that moment marked the onset of pregnancy.
That year, the American Medical Association, in its almighty wisdom, changed the definition of the onset of pregnancy to “implantation.” Nothing was different. Nothing changed but the words. But now the drug companies, the medical societies and the abortion industry can say emergency contraception does not cause an abortion.
But it does. And changing words does not change facts.
The writer is executive director of the Pittsburgh-based group People Concerned for the Unborn Child (pcuc.org).
- Faithful fan at 92
- Judicial ‘favor’-itism?
- Challenger centers worth cost
- Wrong on boxing
- Emulate Old Dominion
- Really dragging us down III
- Which ‘enemies’?
- Pens’ bad days
- Really dragging us down I
- Really dragging us down II
- Jeannette’s challenges
You must be signed in to add comments
To comment, click the Sign in or sign up at the very top of this page.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.