Cleaner election results
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Saturday, Feb. 2, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Awarding most of Pennsylvania's Electoral College votes by congressional district is a great idea. Why should we voters in rural districts have our votes reversed and all of the state's Electoral College votes cast for someone we soundly defeated? Just because highly questionable vote totals coming out of big cities overwhelm our own?
This change would limit the effect of centralized voter fraud to the districts where it was actually occurring. The result would be more accurate representation of voters' wishes and cleaner election results.
Richard J. Krauland
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Strong enough
- Telling facts
- Budget & business taxes
- ‘We the people’ are veterans
- Islam & women
- Invest in pre-K
- Slots & property taxes
- Our nation’s testing obsession
- Harmar needs better enforcement
- Medicaid’s future
- Zealots’ tactic