More about Addi
More about Addi
Re. the article “One day at a time,” about Addison Sinnamond, the little girl from Apollo with a fatal disorder: I found your story to be offensive because it was not about Addi; it was all about the horrible disease.
The story should've focused more on this beautiful, strong, wonderful little girl and all the things she can do, not just the things she can't do anymore.
Why did the article have to say she is going to die? It could have been worded so much better. The doctor stating that should have been more empathetic. Addi's family and friends know she is going to die, but those words hurt a lot.
Addi's disease, metachromatic leukodystrophy, needs to be brought to the forefront and people should know about it. But how about focusing on this incredible little fighter? There are so many things she can't do anymore — walk, talk, see — but she is still alert. She still laughs. She still smiles. She still has the ability to love those around her.
This article needed some positive aspects of Addison.
The writer is an Apollo native.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- On right track
- Quarantine quandary
- Not ‘too stupid’
- EPA impoverishing seniors
- Back to ‘Mad Men’?
- Thanks, Vikings!
- ‘Change’ promise kept
- Something special
- No-gifts rule needs teeth
- Election in review II
- Invite God to school