Address disruptive students
In his letter “Whither Duquesne schools?” (Jan. 30 and TribLIVE.com), the state's chief recovery officer for the Duquesne City School District writes that the district's test scores, once considered “superb,” now are “among the lowest in the state.” His potential solutions include transferring students to neighboring districts and requiring these schools to adjust to larger class sizes, add programs and increase their budgets. But he admitted that Duquesne once boasted great test scores, so we can conclude that its schools are capable schools.
The problem is disruptive students. We need to have consequences for bad behavior and remove such students from the classroom when necessary. We need to insist that teachers are not burdened with disruption in the classroom.
Sure, we want every student to get a good education to move forward, or society has to deal with the financial burden of dropouts. But at some point, if students don't want to learn, they infringe upon the rights of students who are trying to get a good education.
There is only so much that can be done if students won't cooperate, if parents don't get involved or whatever the problem may be. Students who want to learn are getting the least amount of attention and that's the shame. Weed out the troublemakers and you have a teaching/learning environment.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Wilson Center stupidity I
- Help our vets
- Wilson Center stupidity II
- Don’t call them ‘corporate deserters’
- Why city’s unhappy
- Arnold must cut police force
- No ‘pass’ for Obama
- Why the difference?
- Right to veto
- Pa.’s ‘safety laws’
- Misinformation persists