Obama's double standard
Obama's double standard
In listening to and reading various news reports on the gun control debate, I notice a double standard regarding this issue. While everyone rightly agrees that deranged people using guns to murder people is a senseless tragedy, why does the Obama administration condone murder by other means?
While the president rightly condemns murder by gun, why does he actively promote murder by abortion? Almost a million babies are murdered in our country every year via abortion, yet he says nothing about this tragedy.
Also, what about Operation Fast and Furious? In this failed operation, guns were allowed to be smuggled across the Mexican border by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives without the knowledge of Mexican officials. They were not traced or tracked. These guns were used by Mexican drug cartels to murder Mexican citizens. A U.S. Border Patrol agent also was murdered by someone using one of these guns. This has been documented. So far, no one has been held accountable for this government-sponsored operation. Why is there no outrage coming from Obama concerning this operation?
In light of this, it makes me wonder what Obama's true agenda is for wanting to disarm law-abiding U.S. citizens. Make no mistake about it: His goal is to totally disarm law-abiding citizens.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Russia, not Rice
- Positive & healthy ...
- Goodell’s ‘pick-six’
- Ferguson & contradictions
- Thanks for the coverage
- ... Or free-riding fad?
- More answers, please
- Sticker shock
- Hiring in Westmoreland II
- Blame judges
- Hiring in Westmoreland I