Pittsburgh needs a GOP candidate
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Monday, Feb. 11, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
I'm writing this letter to serve as a call to action for the Allegheny County Republican Committee. The 2013 race for Pittsburgh's mayor has been under way for weeks. As a political consultant for several GOP officials and organizations, I think that the Allegheny County Republican Committee should have a candidate in the spotlight immediately.
RNC Chairman Reince Priebus has just called for the GOP to run more “permanent” campaigns. He said the GOP needs to compete everywhere, not just battleground regions.
It is hard for me to watch the inevitable re-election of Mayor Ravenstahl while the GOP lacks a serious candidate. If re-elected, Ravenstahl will simply continue Pittsburgh's transformation into a failed progressive experiment.
The GOP needs to have a voice in Pittsburgh. There is no message of responsible, commonsense governing in Pittsburgh and that has to change.
Republicans might not win 2013; they might not win 2017. But if they run the permanent campaign that Chairman Priebus calls for, they will gain Pittsburgh's support one vote at a time.
Evan J. Tobin
The writer is District 10 committeeman, Westmoreland County Republican Committee.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Medicaid’s future
- Slots & property taxes
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Harmar needs better enforcement
- Putin’s actions I
- Easily duped Obama fans
- Toomey: No friend of vets
- Springdale’s dysfunction
- Drought answer?
- Apollo-Ridge excellence
- Orwellian redefinitions