Cats, wildlife & people I
In response to the USA Today news story “Cats kill more than believed in past” (Jan. 30 and TribLIVE.com) presenting the controversy over outdoor cats: The basis of the problem is that people are either irresponsible pet owners or ignorant of the fact that cats fall into the category of domestic animals — not wild animals.
They have crossed over to human relationship and are to be cared for. With a few exceptions, pet cats should be indoors or in controlled areas outdoors. Those cats called “feral” are the victims of their uncared-for ancestors.
I have talked with people who work with Trap-Neuter-Return (T-N-R) programs. They are doing a great service to their communities, picking up the slack for negligent people. Examples: People who move away and abandon their domestic cats, causing many problems for neighbors; people who give up responsibility for their pets and dump them somewhere; people who neglect to have their pets spayed or neutered.
So, the problem is definitely with irresponsible people, and the desperate, neglected pets are trying to survive. Please help your no-kill shelters and T-N-R groups. They can't correct the problem overnight but are working hard.
Please educate your friends about the importance of good pet ownership.
Patty Ann Dull
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Inconsistent Wolf
- ObamaCare solution
- Corbett is the honest choice
- Pushing witchcraft
- Keith Rothfus is the right choice
- Ebola: No worries, right?
- Corbett over Wolf I
- Gross in 45th
- White House not playing to win
- Barbour sentence shameful
- Don’t fall for Wolf’s tax scheme