| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Stance not 'political'

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

Letter to the Editor
Monday, Feb. 11, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Stance not ‘political'

I believe the news story “Attorney seeks to bring political stance to Westmoreland bench” (Feb. 1 and about Greensburg attorney Harry Smail Jr. announcing his Westmoreland County Common Pleas Court candidacy is misleading.

Mr. Smail understands the importance of judges being impartial and fair. As a judge, Harry will always uphold the letter of the law and the Constitution. The experiences that Smail has had, in and out of the courtroom, will lead him to be fair in all cases.

His desire to protect the rights of our citizens based on the Constitution is not a political stance; it is what judges are sworn to do. How did we get to this point, where voicing support for the defense of our rights under the Constitution is labeled as “political”?

Alex Copeland

Mt. Pleasant

The writer is campaign manager for Harry Smail Jr.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. Can’t believe ATI statements
  2. WQED beyond repair?
  3. Updated paving needed
  4. ‘Normal’ pitfalls
  5. Data misrepresented
  6. Good for seniors
  7. A WQED loss
  8. The budget impasse
  9. Volkswagen’s ‘sin’
  10. CO2 propaganda war
  11. Pipelines to the future