End prejudice against gays
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, Feb. 7, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
As a concerned high school student, I'm increasingly worried about this nation's attitude towards gays, as demonstrated by Rudy Gagliardi's letter “Gays can change ways” (Feb. 5). Prejudice toward gays is equal to any other type of the discrimination, racial or otherwise.
Mr. Gagliardi implies that being gay is no better than being a pedophile. I am deeply offended by that remark, as I have gay friends.
He implies gay couples are not as qualified to raise adopted children as other couples. What arbitrary indicator does he have to prove or disprove the qualifications of an entire group of people?
The letter also makes religious references to say that being gay and gay marriage is immoral.
That makes me laugh. Anyone with a mature understanding of himself knows true knowledge and faith are derived from self-evident experience and critical thinking.
One's faith is not based solely on blindly believing in what's written in any book and ignoring context.
Furthermore, faith cannot possibly be about interpreting the Bible so literally that it makes radical Islamists laugh.
I urge anyone reading this to condemn the pernicious attitudes toward gays of Gagliardi and so many people across our nation.
To hate a segment of the population because of a random, single human trait that indicates nothing about character, intelligence or heart is pure ignorance.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Lebo’s coyotes
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Saved her life
- About U.S. media
- Wildlife & humans
- Economic drivel
- Fix icy hazard on Rt. 66
- We pay to keep poor warm
- Conspicuous by absence
- Corbett’s budget claim
- Apollo-Ridge excellence