By The Tribune-Review
Published: Monday, Feb. 11, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
I knew something was very wrong when I found myself enthusiastically agreeing with the points that Pat Buchanan made in his column “The GOP obsession” (Feb. 6 and TribLIVE.com) about former Sen. Chuck Hagel's Senate confirmation hearing.
For most of the column, Mr. Buchanan had me going, agreeing with his commonsense approach that the senators missed the significant issues that will face the next secretary of Defense — China, Russia, North Korea, the fallout from the Arab Spring.
And then, true to form, he didn't fail me; Pat Buchanan sees Israel and Jews behind every conspiracy he believes in. That the Republicans who are against Hagel's nomination use Israel as their poster child is unfortunately convenient and self-serving. What's stark is that none of them are Jewish.
The Jewish senators, Democrats, will likely vote for Mr. Hagel. That might be a mistake, given his indifferent responses to many questions, but that's not the fault or effect of AIPAC or anyone else.
Mr. Buchanan really does a disservice to the positions he espouses because of his reflexive anti-Semitism and inability to look beyond what he wants to see.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Medicaid’s future
- Harmar needs better enforcement
- Slots & property taxes
- Putin’s actions I
- Obstacles to hiring
- Conspicuous by absence
- Obama & Reaganomics I
- Funding priorities questioned
- Obama & Reaganomics II
- Prison plan & the public’s say
- Proven success