School board bullies
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, Feb. 7, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
School board bullies
Shame on the Highlands School Board for not allowing the Highlands Little League to use the high school field for its junior division baseball team.
In Little League, 13- and 14-year-olds use 90-foot bases. The Natrona Heights Baseball and Softball Association, which follows Pony rules, plays with 80-foot bases. The district contacted the Highlands Little League and told us to merge with the N.H.B.S.A or we couldn't use the field. The excuse is the district won't allow us to use 90-foot bases. What you're really saying is join the Natrona Heights organization or too bad.
The Highlands School District has a zero tolerance for bullying. Then why is the district bullying a nonprofit organization? The district has a policy stating organizations can use school property without discrimination. Yet you allow N.H.B.S.A. to use school property, but not Highlands Little League. Isn't that discrimination?
Shouldn't parents be able to choose a league? Why take away their option? Did the board make this decision because of pressure from board members associated with N.H.B.S.A. working on their own agenda — to get rid of Little League?
Board member Ryan Hanford said, “Be part of the solution.” Does that mean that anyone who supports Little League is part of the problem?
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Medicaid’s future
- Slots & property taxes
- Harmar needs better enforcement
- Obama & Reaganomics I
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Obama & Reaganomics II
- Shredded Wheat & ‘Low T’
- Putin’s actions I
- Lebo’s coyotes
- Putin’s actions II
- Obstacles to hiring