Criticizing fur decried I
Criticizing fur decried
The letter “Promoting fur decried” (Feb. 7 and TribLIVE.com) by J.L. Ford of Collier misrepresents trapping. A YouTube video called “Destroying the Myth” ( youtube.com/watch?v=Rsj-2o0ux14 ) proves trapping is not bloody and barbaric, as represented in the letter.
Respective state agencies employ wildlife experts to draw up the regulations for trapping of animals. Trappers participate in research that shapes these regulations to cause the least amount of discomfort to fur-bearing animals.
Trappers purchase hunting and fur-taking licenses that fund animal research, wildlife aid and enforcement of these regulations.
Trapping is the best method for removing excess fur bearers, thus reducing disease (rabies, mange), destruction of property (beaver dams) and conflicts with people, such as raccoons raiding garbage cans or coyotes eating family pets.
Fur is a renewable resource made available to us by God.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Animal abuse
- Food for thought
- Appreciate caregivers
- Poisoned long ago
- Trophy shot trumps learning
- Voting insanity
- Election in review I
- Better immigration recipe
- For their own benefit
- EPA not the problem
- Law applies to drillers, too