Bucs' spring park worth trip
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Wednesday, Feb. 27, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
I was delighted to read the Sports story “Volunteers give Pirates a boost in Bradenton” (Feb. 11 and TribLIVE.com). I was lucky enough to attend a game last March at McKechnie Field, the spring training home of the Pittsburgh Pirates, and was amazed at the hospitality provided by the courteous crew of volunteers who tended to us.
From the golf-cart ride from the parking lot, to the chaise longues available for relaxing with a beverage or treat, the experience at McKechnie Field is like none other on the Grapefruit League circuit.
The “old-time” feel of the Pirates' facility takes one back to the good old days when baseball was played for the love of the sport.
It was great to be able to call down to the field from my seat to Bill Virdon and have him turn around and salute me when I called him “Quail,” the Gunner's (the late Bob Prince's) nickname for him.
I also visited the Yankees' facility in Tampa, and although it is a beautiful site, its modern appearance doesn't provide the ambiance of McKechnie. The workers, however, did go out of their way as well to make us feel welcome.
My traveling companion, a die-hard Yankees fan, admitted that old McKechnie won out over the modern Steinbrenner Stadium.
If you are looking for a fairly inexpensive respite from the chill of Pennsylvania in late February or March, go south and see the Pirates at McKechnie. You'll be glad that you did!
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Bloomberg & coal
- Knives vs. guns II
- Knives vs. guns I
- Resurrection? Yes, really
- ‘Son of God’
- Dingell’s lesson
- Tragedy’s ramifications III
- Read it & decide
- Parental dysfunction
- Life-affirming photo
- Not believable