Hate gays, stone adulterers
I believe there is an error in the Feb. 14 letter “Being gay is not OK” by Archie Atkinson. I thought the writer's last name would turn out to be “Bunker.”
Nevertheless, I thank the author for letting me know within his anti-gay diatribe that my happy marriage of 11 years must be dissolved as my wife and I are childless by choice. By Mr. Atkinson's standard, our union is invalid and my wife and I are “stupid.” I thought a lifelong union based on love and devotion was sufficient, but apparently not good enough for people like him.
He asserts the Bible precludes homosexuality from being a legitimate way of life and asks if the Bible could be wrong. No, of course not! Let us resume animal sacrifice and stoning adulterers because the Bible says to do it!
I regret that listening to “the gay agenda” causes Mr. Atkinson to consume alcoholic beverages, but being under the influence of some intoxicant would be the most charitable way to explain his repulsive letter.
I hoped that his letter was a joke, but apparently, and sadly, it is not.
The hatred in this man's heart is regrettable. This is yet another example of those who despise and disavow their neighbor in the name of religion. What would Jesus think?
Oren M. Spiegler
Upper St. Clair
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- More answers, please
- Positive & healthy ...
- Goodell’s ‘pick-six’
- Ferguson & contradictions
- Thanks for the coverage
- ... Or free-riding fad?
- Bring back ‘eagle cam’
- Ferguson & sin
- Blame judges
- Article painted wrong picture
- Hiring in Westmoreland II