Money over environment
By Tribune-Review
Published: Saturday, March 2, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Updated: Saturday, March 2, 2013
In the news story “DEP wants to boost fees on major polluters” (Feb. 5 and TribLIVE.com), the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection stated that due to major polluters either cleaning up their systems or old power plants shutting down, there was not enough fine money coming in to cover DEP operating costs.
My question: Are we to believe that the DEP will now go after everything and anything to make up the deficit?
My conclusion: It has never been about clean air, water, etc. It is strictly about money!
Steve Zingerman
Glenfield
Most Popular Letters
- Country broken The people who …
- Multiple Bibles: It’s OK
- Fox sarcasm
- Guns a public health issue
- Public will win
- Bad situation made worse
- Unions can, churches can’t?
- Sacrament, not style
- ObamaCare in action
- North Irwin’s loss
- Belongs in prison
You must be signed in to add comments
To comment, click the Sign in or sign up at the very top of this page.
If only DEP could pay employees in your ignorance, they would not have a need to raise fees. Do you think people work for the DEP out of the goodness of their hearts? You do realize their is an operating budget right? Of course not; I am sick of people like you that have no clue as to the work done by DEP's employees, trashing them without an understanding of how the "real world" operates. You need money to enforce regulations and have boots on the ground...





