Better in-house brands?
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Monday, Feb. 25, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Regarding the news story “LCB chairman favors dropping in-house brands” (Feb. 17 and TribLIVE.com): The idea of discontinuing the LCB's “private label” brands so as not to compete with industry-branded wines and spirits has merit. But I suggest that with a shot of rebranding, sales of the LCB's house labels could reach new heights.
The trick is to create brands that resonate with Pennsylvanians. Current labels like Copper Sun and TableLeaf do not. So, I submit the following for consideration:
• Yinzersnap — In the black-and-gold bottle, the perfect tailgating schnapps.
• Corbett Falls — Table wines that go down quickly, like the governor's polling numbers.
• Flying Penguin — Named for the state's premier hockey rivalry; blood-red, smooth on ice.
• Single-Lane Road — Sloe gin with a touch of orange. Don't drink and drive!
• Marcellus Wells — Deep, full-bodied wines with earthy undertones. Great for your next fracking party.
• Free Lion — Bitters, with hints of wormwood and sour grapes, from Centre County.
• Bonusgate — Hefty and brazen, these signature wines are sure to end up behind bars all over the state.
Since there will be oceanfront property in Wilmerding before the commonwealth privatizes liquor sales, what have we to lose?
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Shredded Wheat & ‘Low T’
- Prison plan & the public’s say
- Ukraine & history
- Proven success
- Funding priorities questioned
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Drought answer?
- Sovereignty trampled
- Apollo-Ridge excellence
- Orwellian redefinitions
- Keep Laurel Point