| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Sequestration & reality I

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

Letter to the Editor
Thursday, Feb. 28, 2013, 8:55 p.m.

With all the talk of the horrors associated with sequestration — layoffs, furloughs and weaker defense structure — I was surprised to learn there would be no actual cuts, only a very small reduction in planned increases.

There will be funds available for all governmental bodies at the same level as current rates, plus the reduced increases. If these bodies were able to operate up to now, why can't they operate at the new, higher level? Why should layoffs or reductions in national defense be necessary?

Is it possible that large sums in the budget have been or will be spent on more “green” projects, such as failed solar-panel manufacturing, electric cars, windmills and, of course, providing cellphone service to the “poor”?

Lloyd B. Kline

Mt. Lebanon

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. VA denies benefits
  2. Refugees ruse?
  3. Tick carriers
  4. CO2 propaganda war
  5. Volkswagen’s ‘sin’
  6. Bright lines: Boehner’s bombshell
  7. Celebrate MLK, not day of disaster
  8. Photo ID?
  9. Kill camera bill
  10. Unprepared for an EMP
  11. Register now to vote Nov. 3