Sequestration & reality I
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, Feb. 28, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
With all the talk of the horrors associated with sequestration — layoffs, furloughs and weaker defense structure — I was surprised to learn there would be no actual cuts, only a very small reduction in planned increases.
There will be funds available for all governmental bodies at the same level as current rates, plus the reduced increases. If these bodies were able to operate up to now, why can't they operate at the new, higher level? Why should layoffs or reductions in national defense be necessary?
Is it possible that large sums in the budget have been or will be spent on more “green” projects, such as failed solar-panel manufacturing, electric cars, windmills and, of course, providing cellphone service to the “poor”?
Lloyd B. Kline
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Proven success
- Prison plan & the public’s say
- Shredded Wheat & ‘Low T’
- Funding priorities questioned
- Ukraine & history
- Beneficial, irreplaceable
- Quit drilling in state forests
- Needs sign added
- Saved her life