By The Tribune-Review
Published: Tuesday, Feb. 26, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
A moment of truth for the Catholic Church is at hand as cardinals travel to Rome to select a new pope.
Expected to participate is disgraced and disgraceful Cardinal Roger Mahony, former Los Angeles archbishop.
Mahony was a key cog in the vast criminal conspiracy in which molester priests were shielded rather than brought to justice, shamefully shuffled from parish to parish to enable them to evade justice and detection.
Mahony has apologized for his actions, asserting that he did not recognize the long-term effects on a child who has been molested. Does anyone believe him?
Mahony's successor took the rare step of condemning him and ordering that he not participate in public events as an official representative of the church. Mahony has not, however, been defrocked or brought to justice.
Mahony's victims have said that he is lucky not to be in jail, and I concur.
If he is permitted to have a hand in selecting the new pope, the church will demonstrate that it is not ready to reverse the damage and horror inflicted upon the myriad victims of its criminal priests, that it still does not “get it.”
Oren M. Spiegler
Upper St. Clair
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Funding priorities questioned
- Prison plan & the public’s say
- Ukraine & history
- Proven success
- Shredded Wheat & ‘Low T’
- Drought answer?
- Sovereignty trampled
- Apollo-Ridge excellence
- Beneficial, irreplaceable