Faith's places in 'urban village'
Published: Friday, March 1, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
Kudos to Bob Bauder for his upbeat news story “Pittsburgh officials want to create a Downtown ‘urban village' atmosphere“ (Feb. 19 and TribLIVE.com). Mr. Bauder missed a key element of our “urban village”: vibrant places where people live out their faith. The “most livable” city must have places where people can explore the answers to life's big questions.
In Downtown Pittsburgh, you can walk to five churches that have anchored the community for centuries. They're havens for people who need a break. In a town with many needs, the Downtown Ministerium's Walk-In Ministry serves hurting families with food, clothing and other assistance. Even if you're a skeptic when it comes to faith, you can appreciate that we maintain some of the city's most breathtaking spaces.
First Presbyterian Church, like the other Downtown churches, is an architectural gem. I love it when Pittsburghers come here for the first time (we welcomed 500 on Light Up Night). They're amazed by the beauty of the place and the warmth of the people.
We love this “urban village,” just as we have for the last 240 years!
The Rev. Tom Hall
The writer is senior pastor of First Presbyterian Church of Pittsburgh.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Maybe problem is kids
- Failing patients & public
- Menace unaddressed
- ObamaCare Obamination
- New Ken: Riverfront development
- About Quinn & Rose I
- About Quinn & Rose II
- Problems with Roenigk driver
- Privatization disastrous
- Leave ‘God’ out
- Choosing judges I