| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Kane made the right call

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

Letter to the Editor
Friday, March 1, 2013, 8:57 p.m.

On Feb. 14, Attorney General Kathleen Kane rejected Gov. Tom Corbett's attempt to sell the Pennsylvania Lottery. In rebuffing the proposed lottery contract with British-based Camelot Global Services, Kane exercised her office's statutory authority to review all state contracts on constitutionality, legality and form.

The AG determined that the contract infringes on the Legislature's power to make policy decisions regarding the lottery, allows for keno games in violation of the lottery act and usurps the authority of the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board.

Her reasoning is clear, concise and — in my opinion — correct. There is absolutely no valid reason to sell the lottery.

The contract offer promises a growth rate of 3 percent to 4 percent annually over the next 10 years. But here's what the governor doesn't care to tell you: We're exceeding that growth already without privatization. Lottery sales grew a record 8.5 percent last year, increasing profits by more than $100 million under the current public system.

Every penny of that profit goes to programs benefiting our seniors. Every dollar funneled to a private company is pulled out of those programs. So, in effect, the commonwealth would be paying a British company to decrease lottery revenues.

The lottery is a successful and lucrative resource — owned by the people of Pennsylvania. If Gov. Corbett thought that privatizing the Pennsylvania Lottery was a worthy goal, he should have made his case to the people of Pennsylvania. It's clear from his actions that the governor did not want to follow constitutionally mandated procedure, let alone allow a full public vetting of his attempted sale.

Kane said, “It is important that my office perform its role in the system of checks and balances that our government desperately needs and that our citizens deserve.”

I couldn't agree more.

Deberah Kula


The writer, a Democrat, is a state representative for 52nd District.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. WQED beyond repair?
  2. ‘Normal’ pitfalls
  3. Updated paving needed
  4. Can’t believe ATI statements
  5. Data misrepresented
  6. Good for seniors
  7. The pope & child abuse
  8. Pipelines to the future
  9. VA denies benefits
  10. The Vick ‘rub’
  11. The budget impasse