They got out in time
Published: Sunday, March 3, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
The Charlotte Observer story “‘Argo' revives memories of Carolina workers who escaped chaos in Iran” in the print edition of the Feb. 24 Trib brought back memories to my husband and me.
In 1977, we were living in Ahwaz, Iran. My husband, a chemical engineer, was employed by the Oil Service Co. of Iran. Living there was not an easy situation, but life was quite pleasant at that time under the Shah, especially for Iranian women, who had no restrictions such as wearing the burka or bans on driving or working.
The Shah's wife, Empress Farah, founded many welfare organizations, including girls' orphanages. At the time I lived there, I was on the welfare board for the American Women's Association; I visited an orphanage each month to celebrate girls' birthdays and get to know them. They appeared to be very happy and healthy children. My family was also fortunate to visit the historic sites in a beautiful country.
Prior to the overthrow of the Shah, life in the area became very unsettled, so we decided to leave. There were no arrangements made for our safety. Shortly before leaving, I met the wife of Paul Grimm, a Texas executive. Mrs. Grimm told me that an overseas tour would be her husband's last before retiring to their horse ranch. Sadly, a month later, he was killed on the street that we lived on.
In 1978, we departed the country right before many of the expatriates' homes were burned to the ground.
Margaret D. Ackerman
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- The Constitution & Ten Commandments
- Decision dubious
- Deer not the problem I
- Deer not the problem II
- ObamaCare & ‘agitprop’
- Remember the animals
- Taxable minimum wage
- He’s every-Santa Who is Santa …
- Antiquated criterion
- Don’t hold your breath
- ObamaCare & ‘geezers’