| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Beer distributor's view

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

Letter to the Editor
Sunday, March 3, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Beer distributor's view

I find the Trib's stance favoring liquor-sales privatization ignorant of details. Maybe the state should not be in the liquor business, but the details of our ignorant governor's plan only show how beholden he is to political donors.

“D”-license beer distributors, of which there are about 1,200, would have to pay $150,000 for the privilege of selling wine and spirits. Yet the big-box stores, large grocery chains and large pharmacies would pay a pittance to obtain those licenses (including beer). Where is the equity?

We have been hobbled by Liquor Control Board regulations since Prohibition ended. Now, all of a sudden, Gov. Corbett sees fit to gut regulation in the name of children and convenience. Cut me a break! So, before the Trib again pushes privatization of the liquor stores, look at the whole deal and the fine print.

Does the sale of casino gambling licenses ring a bell? The state sold the licenses for $50 million, vs. the $300 million to $400 million that was estimated by outside sources.

Wake up, Trib. The proof of this bad deal is in the fine print. Corbett is a master of obfuscation under the guise of “liquor privatization.” If all else fails, it is for the children and convenience. “Payback” sounds better.

Norman Sunday


The writer owns Bargain Beer N Pop in Johnstown.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Letters

  1. Boot callous pols
  2. No PSU cover-up
  3. Pipelines to the future
  4. WQED beyond repair?
  5. Data misrepresented
  6. Updated paving needed
  7. Can’t believe ATI statements
  8. ‘Normal’ pitfalls