O'Brien for prothonotary
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Sunday, March 3, 2013, 11:40 p.m.
I want to thank Rich Schachte for his letter: “Allegheny: Pay Westmoreland heed” (Feb. 22). He's opened a discussion concerning the Westmoreland County prothonotary's office and proving that it's wrong to make blanket statements based on party affiliation.
Prothonotary Christina O'Brien is a proud Democrat. She refuses to hide behind labels or run toward voting trends just to get elected. She stands on her record.
Since taking office, she has made key budget cuts, upgraded technology and increased public access to civil court records, including electronically publishing naturalization records. In the near future, the office will provide credit card services for its customers and is working with the Westmoreland Bar Association to implement e-filing.
Christina has 22 dedicated and motivated employees who take great pride in their work. Her office regularly receives calls and letters complimenting them on its service.
All of these things were done by a Democrat. The courthouse needs a responsible and balanced government that includes all parties. Christina has never viewed herself as a “politician,” just a public servant trying to do the best job possible and improve our community.
This office does not belong to a political party; it belongs to the taxpayers of Westmoreland County.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- No basis for NRA criticism II
- Voting rights bill
- No basis for NRA criticism III
- No basis for NRA criticism I
- Respect for vets
- Debating LEED’s worth I