Scouts at Highlands
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, Feb. 28, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
Scouts at Highlands
I attended a recent Highlands School Board meeting with my Boy Scout troop and I was ashamed at what the boys had to witness. The Scouts, all under the age of 13, had to attend as a part of a merit badge requirement and saw some members of the board acting unprofessionally and inappropriately.
The Highland's Little League wanted to know why it was not permitted to use the high school field this year, but Natrona Heights Baseball & Softball Association was. Some board members, who should know how to act in front of minors, yelled and gave evasive answers regarding why Highland's Little League can't use a community field.
We pay taxes just like everyone else in the district. Why can't the leagues merge? The new league could offer both Pony and Little League and let parents decide in which their child should play. If a merger occurred, we wouldn't have the issues with the high school field.
Eventually, one board member walked out. What is that telling the youth who were present?
This is inappropriate behavior from officials the next generation needs to look up to and respect. It's hard for me, as a leader, to instill in them the importance of good morals, values and respect for one another when adults behave this way.
All I ask is that certain school board members be aware of their audience and who is watching because you never know how you can affect a young person's view.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Slots & property taxes
- Medicaid’s future
- Harmar needs better enforcement
- Obama & Reaganomics II
- Putin’s actions I
- Obama & Reaganomics I
- Our nation’s testing obsession
- Obstacles to hiring
- Drought answer?
- Apollo-Ridge excellence
- Beneficial, irreplaceable