Share This Page

Private schools & sports

| Monday, March 4, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

I may be the biggest fan of high school sports so I have to let my feelings be known. Nothing is as unfair as private schools competing against the public schools in the WPIAL and PIAA in high school sports.

I have nothing against the kids from private schools, but I have everything against the WPIAL and PIAA for allowing this to happen and for allowing so many transfers for “academic reasons.“ That's a crock in the vast majority of transfers.

Watching Leechburg walk through several Catholic schools in 2007 on their way to the championship was one of the biggest highlights for me. But in 2013, the Burrell girls basketball team was doing great, but had to play Bishop Canevin in the semifinals. We know Burrell lost that game. But at least we got to see the Burrell boys knock off Greensburg Central Catholic on their way to the Class AA championship game.

On Saturday, Clairton played Vincentian Academy in the Class A finals. I was rooting for Clairton, but Vincentian won.

I believe you should educate your kids in your own school district from kindergarten through their senior year.

My bet is the natural gas industry will be opening up a charter school to teach kids entering that field and it'll have a basketball team.

Ernie Sipolino

Leechburg

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.