By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, March 7, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
Professor Donald J. Boudreaux raises some interesting numbers about the minimum wage in his column “Minimum questions about minimum wage” (Feb. 28 and TribLIVE.com). I have no doubt his numbers are correct; however, I have a personal take on this, as I started working for the minimum wage in 1963, cleaning offices.
After holding a number of jobs and finishing trade school in 1969, I began work as an entry-level electronics tech, a skill position. The master repairman at that time made $3.08 an hour, plus benefits. The minimum wage was $1.30 an hour. Run the numbers. Minimum age was 42 percent of a “living/skill” wage.
I retired as a carpenter (union member) and my wage at that time was approximately $24 an hour. At the same 42-percent proportion as in 1969, this works out to $10.08 for minimum wage. Draw your own conclusions. In 1969, we were a world leader and were not competing in a global market.
Kenneth J. Murdy
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Consequences in space
- Tragedy sensationalized
- Dingell’s lesson
- Cover many stances
- Tragedy’s ramifications I
- Valley musical superb
- Paying for ‘Fayette’s Folly’
- The Obama Doctrine I wonder …
- Stop currying Saudis’ favor
- Resurrection? Really?