I oppose any form of gun ban, magazine ban or a ban on the manufacturing of certain guns. I'm also against gun registration, restricting gun show sales, and any law requiring gun insurance.
I believe in the Second Amendment of our Constitution. I took an oath to protect and defend our Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and domestic. We now have a domestic enemy — gun control and those who support it. These “gun-grabbers” are attacking our Second Amendment and our individual rights.
I do not believe that the people who support this gun banning truly know what they are doing. That includes our congressman, Mike Doyle, and President Obama.
The president and his cronies do not realize how deep-seated our belief in guns is. Gun owners are a huge and patriotic group. The Obama crew has declared war on gun owners.
If this gun ban mistake somehow becomes law, I can see this country being split apart and the coming of a second revolution.
The government knew that our schools had security problems after the Columbine killings, but did nothing. Funding should have been made available for more security in our schools. Now the government is scapegoating guns to cover its failure to protect our children.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- View from Florida
- Don’t forget Highmark patients
- Seek ‘post-combustion future’
- Hazardous ride
- Terrorism & immigration
- EPA proposal a threat to all
- Beyond wacky
- ‘Sin’ that saved lives
- In PC we must II
- Perk in peril?
- Conservatives, back Corbett