Which Ten Commandments?
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Friday, March 15, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
One good reason for the Greensburg Catholic Diocese to be slow in approving a posting of the Ten Commandments in front of one of its churches, in this case, at St. John's in Connellsville (“Ten Commandments movement going strong,” Feb. 28 ), is that the posting would have to be the Catholic version of the Ten Commandments, not the Protestant version.
The Catholic version differs on the Second Commandment regarding graven images.
Catholics also split up the commandments regarding coveting of property, not wanting to include wives as property along with animals and material possessions, etc., as in the original.
Is the “Thou shalt not move” organization willing to acknowledge the Catholic Church's postings of its approved version of these “words of God”? Perhaps the best solution is to post both sets of commandments side by side at the school in dispute and everywhere else. Then, to be thorough, add the third set from Exodus 34.
The writer is Mt. Pleasant native and a 1968 Geibel graduate.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Drug trafficking in West Tarentum
- Sprinklers needed
- Administrators’ role
- Fayette County business as usual?
- Good ol’ days
- Money for litter pickup?
- She’ll be missed
- Economics dissent
- Cemetery thefts
- Selling tax claims a bad idea
- Tragedy’s ramifications II