Paying for death row
Paying for death row
Why do we keep paying state sales tax, gasoline tax, income tax? Could it be to keep nearly 200 convicted killers on death row?
At a cost of around $110,000 a year to keep one killer alive, it takes a lot of our tax money. Do the math.
How long are we going to let this happen? For 10 more years, 20, maybe 40? Why? These killers have been sentenced to death. Why are we paying to keep them alive?
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Missile defense, not talks
- Majority defied
- Russia, not Rice
- Positive & healthy ...
- Pols’ real interest
- Thanks for the coverage
- Goodell’s ‘pick-six’
- Ferguson & contradictions
- ... Or free-riding fad?
- Sticker shock
- More answers, please