Rachel Weaver's news story “Pittsburgh region educators rely more on technology, less on lectures” (Feb. 25 and TribLIVE.com) was on target, based on Hamill Manufacturing's eight years of experience with the BotsIQ program each spring.
A shrinking trained workforce prompted the Pittsburgh Chapter of the National Tooling & Machining Association and a group of manufacturers and educators to bring BotsIQ to the region. Competition culminates in a two-day, gladiator-style battle of student-made robots. Fifty-two companies support 42 schools.
BotsIQ offers students hands-on application of principles critical to engineering, college and job skills (scheduling, project management, budgeting and production control) and influences career choices.
A STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) high school program, BotsIQ was in action long before this focus on science and math.
BotsIQ promotes job readiness, too. Students are hired by BotsIQ business partners, including an apprentice we hired at Hamill. Another is a production technician at Advanced Acoustic Concepts. At Composidie, a student is completing worksite training. Another was just hired by Rock-Built in West Deer.
Students who enjoy how things are made are the future of the high-tech manufacturing workforce — BotsIQ's strategy for nearly a decade. Come see why. The April 19 and 20 competition at California University of Pennsylvania is free and open to the public. Visit botsiqpa.org .
Phyllis E. Miller
The writer is human resources manager for Hamill Manufacturing Co. in Penn Township, Westmoreland County.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Reverse red-kettle ban I
- Good riddance
- Reverse red-kettle ban II
- Not taxpayers’ responsibility
- Idea for casino
- Punishment pushback I
- Punishment pushback II
- Don’t blame bus drivers I
- Don’t blame bus drivers II