Fees for fixes
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Wednesday, March 13, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Fayette County commissioners recently voted to use Marcellus shale impact-fee money to hire a $60,000-a-year cheerleader to tell us how great the industry is for the local economy (“Marcellus fees will pay salaries,” Feb. 20 and TribLIVE.com). The money is from impact fees and should go to repair damages caused by the Marcellus shale natural gas industry.
Send the money to townships so they can repair damage the industry walks away from. Or why not hire someone to give legal aid to the growing list of county residents who have property damage and contracts broken by the industry?
Our township road is being destroyed and is routinely covered in mud, but as long as commissioners Vince Zapotosky and Al Ambrosini have money to squander, who cares about the residents and townships the Marcellus industry is actually having an impact on?
I know doing the right thing would probably hurt Zapotosky's campaign finances, as he takes money from the industry, but he needs to “man up” and remember that he is supposed to be working for the people of Fayette County, not the gas industry.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Lebo’s coyotes
- Drought answer?
- Fix icy hazard on Rt. 66
- Conspicuous by absence
- Saved her life
- Consistently unflattering
- Wildlife & humans
- We pay to keep poor warm
- Thanks to firefighters
- Corbett’s budget claim
- Beneficial, irreplaceable